Design Review and Change Control#
Document ID |
DHF-008 |
|---|---|
Version |
1.0 |
Date |
2026-03-22 |
Author |
camt053 Engineering |
Status |
Released |
ISO 13485 Clauses |
7.3.4 (Design and Development Review), 7.3.9 (Design Changes) |
1. Design Review Records#
1.1 DR-001: Architecture Review#
Review ID |
DR-001 |
|---|---|
Date |
2026-03-21 |
Phase |
Phase 1 (Core XML Generation) |
Scope |
Module architecture, message-type dispatch strategy, data flow, exception hierarchy |
Participants |
Lead Engineer, Quality Assurance |
Findings |
(a) 14-package modular architecture provides clear separation of concerns. (b) Message-type dispatch via dictionary enables O(1) lookup and extensibility without modifying existing code. (c) Exception hierarchy with single base class supports catch-all handling at API and CLI boundaries. |
Disposition |
Approved. Architecture supports the camt.052/053/054 message family with a consistent pattern for adding future message types. |
Action Items |
None. Proceed to Phase 2. |
1.2 DR-002: Security Review#
Review ID |
DR-002 |
|---|---|
Date |
2026-03-21 |
Phase |
Phase 6 (Security Hardening) |
Scope |
XXE prevention, path traversal protection, SQL input validation, log sanitization, template injection prevention, container security |
Participants |
Lead Engineer, Security Reviewer |
Findings |
(a) defusedxml completely disables XXE attack surface — verified by security-marked tests. (b) Path jail restricts file access to cwd, tempdir, and /var/tmp with realpath resolution. (c) Jinja2 autoescape=True prevents SSTI. (d) Log sanitization strips control characters before emission. (e) Docker runs as non-root user. (f) Bandit SAST reports zero findings. |
Disposition |
Approved. All OWASP Top 10 relevant attack vectors are mitigated with defense-in-depth controls. |
Action Items |
None. All security controls verified by automated tests. |
1.3 DR-003: SWIFT Compliance Review#
Review ID |
DR-003 |
|---|---|
Date |
2026-03-21 |
Phase |
Phase 4 (SWIFT Compliance) |
Scope |
Charset validation (Z/z set), field length enforcement, transliteration, BIC/IBAN/LEI validation, message-type-specific features |
Participants |
Lead Engineer, Domain Expert |
Findings |
(a) BIC validation follows ISO 9362 format rules.
(b) IBAN validation implements ISO 7064 mod-97-10 checksum.
(c) LEI validation follows ISO 17442 format and check-digit rules.
(d) Inbound camt.052/053/054 statements parse correctly across every
ISO version (namespace-agnostic), and ISO return reason codes
(e.g. AC04 Closed Account) drive entry filtering.
(e) Reversing entries flip
CdtDbtInd, set RvslInd=true, and
carry the original references, reason, and counterparty. |
Disposition |
Approved. Parsing, reason filtering, and reversal generation meet ISO 20022 message standards. |
Action Items |
None. Conformance tests verify behaviour against the official ISO business samples. |
1.4 DR-004: API and Interface Review#
Review ID |
DR-004 |
|---|---|
Date |
2026-03-21 |
Phase |
Phase 5 (Interface Layer) |
Scope |
Python API ( |
Participants |
Lead Engineer, Quality Assurance |
Findings |
(a) A single |
Disposition |
Approved. All interfaces share one facade and provide appropriate access to core functionality with proper input validation. |
Action Items |
None. Interface tests cover all endpoints and options. |
2. Change Control Log#
Design changes are tracked in CHANGELOG.md using Keep a Changelog format.
The following table summarizes changes relevant to the DHF:
Version |
Date |
Summary |
|---|---|---|
0.0.1 |
2026-03-21 |
Initial release. Parse camt.052/053/054 (namespace-agnostic, every
ISO version) and generate validated camt.053.001.14 reversing entries.
Reason-code filtering (ISO return reason codes). Jinja2 template engine
with official-XSD validation. Single |
3. Design Change Process#
All design changes follow this procedure:
3.1 Change Request#
Change is proposed via GitHub Issue or Pull Request
Change request includes: description, rationale, affected components, risk assessment
3.2 Impact Analysis#
Identify affected modules, tests, and documentation
Review requirements traceability (DHF-007) for impacted requirements
Review risk register (DHF-005) for new or modified risks
Determine if change requires design review
3.3 Implementation#
Create feature branch from main
Implement change following coding standards (ruff, black, mypy strict)
Add or update tests to maintain >= 99% branch coverage
Update documentation if affected
3.4 Verification#
All pre-commit hooks pass (13 hooks)
Full CI pipeline passes (test, lint, security, smoke jobs)
Branch coverage >= 99% maintained
Bandit SAST reports zero findings
Gold master tests pass (if XML generation affected)
3.5 Review and Approval#
Pull request reviewed by at least one team member
Design review conducted if change affects architecture, security, or compliance (DR record created)
Change merged via signed commit
3.6 Post-Change Activities#
Update CHANGELOG.md with change summary
Update DHF documents if requirements, architecture, risks, or traceability are affected
Tag release if change is included in a version release